Consensus on diagnosis and management of primary antibody deficiencies
H M Chapel for the Consensus Panel for the Diagnosis and Management of Primary Antibody Deficiencies
Primary antibody deficiency
syndromes include congenital and acquired antibody deficiencies but not those
secondary to other diseases such as myeloma, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia,
or protein losing enteropathy. Hypogammaglobulinaemia was the diagnosis usually
given to patients with low serum immunoglobulin concentrations without an identifiable
cause, but these patients are more accurately described as having primary antibody
deficiency. There is a range of primary antibody defects (box),1 though the
clinical significance of some subgroups has been recognised only recently.2-4
The diagnosis of a primary antibody deficiency is often overlooked in both children
and adults. Untreated patients with unrecognised primary antibody deficiencies
suffer from recurrent infections, some of which may be severe - for example,
pneumonia and meningitis.2-5 In addition, they may have long term complications,
such as enteropathy leading to malabsorption and anaemia.6 About half of the
patients without a diagnosis will be admitted to hospital every year; they may
also be seen in different specialty clinics for a range of complications. They
often receive almost continuous antibiotics for infections and are off work
for long periods of time.
Types of primary
antibody deficiencies
• Common variable immune deficiency
- Low serum IgG and IgA concentrations, including IgG subclasses,
with or without low serum IgM levels
• X linked antibody deficiency
- Occurs in boys before the age of 2 years
- Some have a family history
• IgG subclass deficiencies
- May be an indication for immunoglobulin replacement therapy
in patients with recurrent infections who also do not produce specific IgG antibodies
after test immunisations
• Specific antibody deficiency
- Occurs in patients with a classic history of humoral immune deficiency
who fail to respond to test immunisations, despite having normal serum concentrations
of total IgG, IgA, IgM, and IgG subclasses
• Selective IgA deficiency
- Occurs in 1 in 700 of population
- Many affected people may be symptom free, particularly if deficiency
is discovered by chance
- Patients with the deficiency who have recurrent infections may
also have an underlying deficiency in a subclass of IgG or specific
antibody
Summary points
• Lack of awareness of the range of primary antibody defects has resulted
in considerable underdiagnosis and diagnostic delay
• Patients who receive an early diagnosis and appropriate immunoglobulin
replacement therapy lead normal lives; those in whom the condition
is undiagnosed have recurrent infections, often severe, as well as malabsorption,
anaemia, or bronchiectasis - primary antibody deficiency is a costly diagnosis
to miss
• Not all patients present with recurrent acute infections in childhood:
failure to thrive, unexplained hepatosplenomegaly or arthropathy, and chronic
infection are common presenting features, and over 95% of patients present as
adults
• All patients should be referred to a consultant immunologist for precise
diagnosis and long term management, often in conjunction with an appropriate
specialist or paediatrician, or both
• Recent expansion of clinical immunology services allows opportunities
for better patient care
Immunoglobulin replacement therapy obviates most of these complications7 - primary
antibody deficiency is a costly diagnosis to miss.
The term primary antibody deficiency has been expanded to include several types
of deficiencies, of which common variable immune deficiency1 is the most widespread.
According to Swedish data on prevalence,8 there should be around 2500 such patients
in the United Kingdom,9 but the British register for primary immune deficiencies
currently records less than 1000 such patients.10 Furthermore, a survey in the
North West region showed that the average diagnostic delay for common variable
immune deficiency was 2.5 years in children and 5.5 years in adults,11 which
shows the poor awareness of this condition. As few as 1 in 4 hospital consultants
and I in 15 general practitioners probably have a patient with the condition
on their list.
A common reason for this lack of awareness in adults is the widespread but erroneous
belief that all primary immune deficiencies present in childhood. Ninety five
per cent of patients with common variable immune deficiency present after the
age of 6 years.5 Diagnostic delay results in unnecessary morbidity from untreated
disease and makes patients with complications from longstanding primary antibody
immunodeficiency difficult to manage. Confusion with HIV disease has caused
considerable distress in many patients.
Indicators
of primary antibody deficiencies.
• Unexplained failure to thrive
• Excess of infections
-Recurrent infections at different sites, or even within a single
system, requiring frequent prescription of antibiotics
-Particularly severe, unusual or persistent infections (such as
bronchiectasis) even if serum immunoglobulin concentrations are normal
-Need for intervention for chronic infections such as tonsillitis,
otitis media, or recurrent boils
-Need for instigation of second line tests for chronic infection—for
example, sweat tests or ciliary beat measurements
• Abnormal lymphoid tissue, such as nodular lymphoid hyperplasia in the
gut or congenital absence of tonsils
• Unexplained signs such as hepatosplenomegaly or arthropathy
The scarcity of clinical immunology services in the past has resulted in many
patients being managed in centres where only a few patients with antibody deficiencies
are seen. As a result of this lack of experience, the management of some patients
has been inadequate, to say the least. With the recent expansion of clinical
immunology services, the availability of services has become more widespread
and immunological advice is given more quickly, resulting in opportunities for
better patient care. As a result of an initiative from the patient support society,
the Primary Immunodeficiency Association, a group of physicians, paediatricians,
and specialists in related disciplines, met with nominated representatives from
the Royal College of General Practitioners, Royal College of Nursing, and a
consultant in Public Health Medicine (for purchasers) to develop consensus guidelines
for the diagnosis and management of primary antibody deficiencies.
Whom to test?
Clinical history is the most important aspect of suspecting a diagnosis of primary
antibody deficiencies. Failure of antibody production results in reduced host
defence to pathogens, particularly bacteria; many patients therefore present
with recurrent infections due to a wide range of common organisms. These infections
may not necessarily be life threatening and are often quite mild, responding
normally to oral antibiotics. Not all patients present with recurrent infections;
the box shows the clinical clues that should raise suspicions of immune deficiency
so that the appropriate tests may be performed.
How to diagnose?
All patients in whom there is a definite or suspected antibody defect should
be referred to a specialist clinical immunologist. Since antibody deficiencies
are uncommon, there is a need for considerable clinical experience in interpreting
the tests as well as in assessing the clinical history.
When serum immunoglobulin concentrations are greatly depressed confirmatory
tests are not always necessary. However, patients with serum IgG concentrations
in the low part of the normal range and a history of recurrent infections require
investigation (box). Confirmatory tests, such as the absence of specific antibodies
following both immunisations and infections (to which the patient is known to
have been
exposed), are required. Interpretation of poor or suboptimal immunisation responses
requires in-depth training and skill, and these assays should be performed only
in specialist centres. Measurements of IgG subclasses, like serum immunoglobulin
concentrations, are related to the normal range for age. It is important not
only to measure antibody responses to test immunisation but also to assess the
extent of concurrent T-cell deficiency.
In addition to their immunological assessment, patients should have investigations
to identify the degree of long-term damage present at the start of treatment
to provide a baseline against which the efficacy of treatment can be monitored.
Role of specialists in clinical immunology
Patients must have a full immunological assessment before starting immunoglobulin
treatment. This is best done by referral to their nearest clinical immunologist.
With the expansion of clinical immunology centres in the past decade, specialist
care is readily available in most regions of the United Kingdom (appendix).
Most patients will require treatment. However, some patients gradually develop
antibody deficiency over several years and patients with a classic history of
immunodeficiency who have normal results at their initial investigation therefore
require specialist follow up and may need replacement therapy several years
later. Likewise, patients with low immunoglobulin concentrations detected by
chance should also be followed up as most such patients develop symptoms eventually
and require replacement therapy.
Most consultant immunologists prefer to start immunoglobulin replacement therapy
in their own centre, where specialist immunology nurses can help with the management
and education of the patients and their relatives. The choice of immunoglobulin
therapy, both product and route of administration, is complex. Clinical immunologists
are familiar with the range of products and their availability, so that replacement
therapy can be tailored to individual patient needs. A high proportion of patients
can join a recognised self infusion immunoglobulin programme (see appendix).12
After formal training in a recognised centre patients are monitored by the consultant
immunologist every three to six months. Those whose cases are unsuitable may
be referred to their local hospital for maintenance immunoglobulin replacement
therapy, which will be supervised by a nurse specialising in immunology; the
treatment of these patients is also assessed regularly in the consultant immunologist's
clinic.
Clinical immunologists need to continue to review all patients as outpatients
every three to six months to assess progress and to detect possible complications.
How to diagnose primary antibody deficiencies
All patients who have or are suspected of having an antibody defect should be
referred to a specialist immunologist, who will usually measure:
• Serum immunoglobulin
concentrations in relation to normal ranges for age
• Test immunisations: antibody responses (IgG) to proteins and carbohydrate
vaccines
• Existing antibody (IgG) responses to previous infections
• Existing antibody (IgG) responses to previous known immunisations
• IgG subclasses related to normal ranges for age
• Lymphocyte subpopulations concerned with antibody production
Patients with chronic chest or gastrointestinal disease also need continued
advice from their chest physician or gastroenterologist. Shared care between
immunologists and local physicians or paediatricians may be necessary, especially
if the patient lives a long way from the immunology centre, shared care with
the general practitioner is essential. Patient or parent held records are recommended
to ensure good communication (these are not a substitute for doctors' records).
Aims of management
The aims of management, which are largely the same in adults and children, are
to prevent the onset of complications and to enable a normal working capability
and life expectancy, and in children to ensure optimal growth and development
(box). Patients require replacement immunoglobulin; this is available in three
forms, depending on whether it is given intravenously, intramuscularly, or subcutaneously.
Immunoglobulin replacement therapy
The efficacy of immunoglobulin was originally shown in the Medical Research
Council trial (1955-70) of intramuscular immunoglobulin. Since then intravenous
immunoglobulin has been shown to be the treatment of choice since trials showed
that higher doses of intravenous immunoglobulin were more effective.13
Once the preparation and its route of administration have been selected for
a patient, the minimal risks of viral transmission and possible adverse reactions
to immunoglobulin therapy should be discussed with the patient. He or she should
also be given an opportunity to discuss the treatment with a patient who has
experienced similar immunoglobulin replacement. Liver transaminase concentrations,
serum creatinine concentration, and anti-IgA antibody titres (if indicated)
should be measured as baseline. On the day of infusion overt active infection
should be excluded as immunoglobulin infusions during an acute infection may
result in serious adverse reactions.
The dose of intravenous immunoglobulin required is initially determined by the
severity and frequency of infections as well as the serum IgG concentration.
Most patients receive about 400 mg/kg/month, usually in two doses, two weeks
apart, since the half life is 3 weeks7; very few require doses of 1 g/kg/month
in divided doses.13
INTRAVENOUS IMMUNOGLOBULIN
Intravenous immunoglobulin is the preferred treatment for most patients with
antibody deficiencies. The World Health Organisation has produced criteria for
the production of suitable preparations.14 Each is the product of a different
manufacturing process so that products are not interchangeable. Indiscriminate
use of more than one product in a given patient will prevent identification
of the source of hepatitis C or other transmissible agent if such an infection
occurs.
Adverse reactions are mostly related to infusion rates. The first few intravenous
infusions should be given very slowly, with antihistamine and hydrocortisone
available. Adrenaline should always be available, even at home, in case of anaphylaxis.
Adverse reactions may be mild, moderate, or severe.15 In some patients symptoms,
particularly headaches or abdominal pain, may be delayed for up to 24 hours
after an infusion. In rare cases patients may develop antibodies to IgA after
infusion of blood, plasma, or immunoglobulin containing IgA.18 IgA free material
should be used for patients with very high or rising litres of IgA antibodies.17
Aims of management
• To prevent further acute infections
• To halt the progress of complications if present
• To reverse previous damage when possible
• To recognise further complications early and manage them, particularly
those not amenable to replacement immunoglobulin therapy
• To avoid complications of replacement immunoglobulin therapy
• To develop approaches to management, based on individual needs, for
the lifelong replacement of immunogiobulin, including self administration when
possible
• To encourage greater participation of patients in the management of
their disease
• To ensure good liaison with patients and all their medical advisers
Regular follow up by a clinical immunologist is essential; in patients with
specific complications shared care with an appropriate specialist is necessary.
INTRAMUSCULAR IMMUNOGLOBULIN
Intramuscular immunoglobulin is now largely superseded by intravenous immunoglobulin.
Although transmission of infectious agents, including hepatitis viruses, by
intramuscular immunoglobulin has not been reported, the risk of an immediate
adverse reaction is considerable; up to a fifth of patients have a reaction
at some time, and these reactions may be severe (anaphylactoid).
RAPID SUBCUTANEOUS IMMUNOGLOBULIN
Some intramuscular and intravenous immunoglobulins may be given subcutaneously.
Rapid subcutaneous immunoglobulin infusions are still at an early stage of use
in the United Kingdom, though there is considerable experience in adults in
Sweden. A European collaborative group is investigating the use of such infusions
in children. A multicentre studv is also underway in Europe to compare the efficacy
with that of intravenous immunoglobulin in adults.
TRANSMISSION OF VIRUSES
To date no immunoglobulin preparation has been found to transmit retroviral
infection, probably because this group of viruses is destroyed by cold ethanol
during manufacture.19 Several preparations, however, have been associated with
outbreaks of non-A, non-B hepatitis; such transmission was related to particular
batches of intraveous immunoglobulin.20 Since fractionation does not completely
inactivate or eliminate this group of viruses, the transmission of non-A, non-B
(including hepatitis C) viruses is probably a result of the size of the inoculum.
To prevent contaminated donations being used all manufacturers are now required
to test all donations for hepatitis C antibodies as well as HIV antibodies and
hepatitis B surface antigen. The manufacture of some intravenous immunoglobulins
includes heat treatment or the addition of detergent specifically to inactivate
viruses. Batch numbers of all preparations infused into individual patients
must be recorded to enable the contaminated batch to be traced if viral transmission
occurs.
Complications of primary antibody deficiencies
ACUTE INFECTIONS
Despite adequate immunoglobulin treatment break- through infections may occur. They should be treated quickly with appropriate antibiotics at the maximum dose and for longer than in immunocompetent patients. Prophylactic antibiotics should be given only after consultation with the organ based specialist and others concerned with the patient's care. Unusual organisms such as mycoplasmas, which are difficult to culture, may be the cause of infection.
LONG TERM COMPLICATIONS
Chronic disease may
be associated with the natural course of the condition, delayed diagnosis, or
inade- quate treatment.2,6 Long term complications are listed in the box.
Patients with persistent purulent sputum should be assessed and managed jointly
with a chest physician to prevent progressive lung damage and to monitor functional
impairment.3 Meticulous attention to postural physiotherapy, antibiotics, bronchodilators,
and local anti-inflammatory agents is needed if insidious progression of lung
damage is to be arrested. Discrete pulmonary shadows may be due to granulomas,
and the patient may not require treatment; symptomatic lesions may respond to
oral corticosteroids. Patients with antibody deficiencies, as well as their
families, should not smoke.
Adults often present with recurrent sinusitis. A full otorhinolaryngological
assessment (including nasendoscopy and computed tomography) is needed; local
treatment of the nose may decrease the frequency of infections. When diarrhoea
and malabsorption are recurrent or persistent several, careful attempts should
be made to detect a pathogen in the stool. Endoscopy may be needed to obtain
appropriate biopsy specimens, which should always be stained for specific pathogens
-for example, giardia or cryptosporidia. Abnormal results in liver function
tests may reflect naturally or iairogenically acquired hepatitis.
Long term complications of primary antibody deficiencies
Chest
• Bronchiectasis
• Fungal infections (rarely)
• Polyclonal lymphoid aggregates
• Granulomas
• Lymphoma
Sinuses
• Recurrent sinusitis
Gut
• Infections (giardia, cryptosporidia)
• Malabsorption
• Superinfection
• Autoimmune enteropathy
• Sclerosing cholangitis
• Atrophic gastritis
• Food sensitive enteropathy
• Colitis
• Gastric carcinoma
Liver
• Naturally acquired hepatitis
• Associated autoimmune diseases (chronic active hepatitis,
primary biliary cirrhosis, sclerosing cholangitis)
• Non-infective granulomas
Joints
• Septic anthropathy
• Chronic sterile arthropathy and/or arthralgia
Blood
• Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia
• Immune thrombocytopenic purpura
• Iron deficiency anaemia
• Anaemia of chronic illness
• Aplastic anaemia
Brain
• Acute enteroviral meningoencephalitis
• Chronic cerebral granulomas
Spleen
• Unexplained splenomegaly in 30
Eyes
• Keratoconjunctivitis
• Uveitis
Septic arthropathy
may present insidiously. Chronic arthropathy or arthralgia is often sterile,
transient, and usually related to infection elsewhere, suggesting a cause related
to the immune complex. In a few patients it may be persistent, especially if
diagnosis and treatment have been delayed.
Anaemia is common and may be due to iron deficiency or chronic illness. Iron
deficiency anaemia is more common in patients with diarrhoea or atrophic gastritis.
Unexplained persistent, non-troublesome splenomegaly occurs in 30% of patients.
The only indications for splenectomy, which should be avoided if possible in
view of the additional risk of infection, are persistent and life threatening
idiopathic thrombo-cytopenic purpura, autoimmune haemolytic anaemia, and clinical
hypersplenism. If lymphoma is suspected for other reasons, biopsy is necessary,
particularly as patients with common variable immune deficiency have an increased
risk of lymphoma.2,6
Awareness of
primary antibody deficiencies
Increasing the patient's understanding of the disease is an important component
of management. Patients should be made aware of the Primary Immunodeficiency
Association and invited to receive relevant publications. The nationwide survey
of consultants recently completed by the association should increase awareness
among the medical profession.
Awareness of these conditions has been highlighted by recent advances in determining
the genes in those antibody defects which are inherited. These are often, but
not exclusively, X linked conditions in which early development of B cells is
abnormal21 or in which the ligands for T and B cell cooperation are abnormal.22
The contribution of the patients and their families to the understanding of
the physiology of antibody production is recognised.
Conclusions
The range of primary antibody defects includes common variable immune deficiency
in children and adults, X linked antibody deficiencies in male infants, and
deficiencies of IgG subclasses and specific antibodies in patients with recurrent
infections. Lack of awareness has resulted in underdiagnosis and diagnostic
delay these diseases should be considered more widely. Recent expansion of clinical
immunology services allows opportunities for better patient care. In view of
the wide range of complications, all patients with primary antibody deficiencies
should be managed by a clinical immunologist, often in conjunction with another
specialist.
This paper is extracted from a fuller document (available from the publications
unit of the Royal College of Pathologists) that has been approved by the following
professional bodies: Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Pathologists,
Royal College of Surgeons, Royal College of General Practitioners, Royal College
of Nursing, Association of Clinical Pathologists, British Society for Immunology,
British Thoracic Society, and British Society of Otolaryngology.
Members of the consensus
panel are: Dr H Chapel (consultant immunologist, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
(chairman)), Professor P Cole (professor of respiratory medicine, National Heart
and Lung Institute, London), Dr C Gabriel (consultant paediatrician, St Albans
City Hospital),
Dr P Milla (consultant paediatric gastroenterologist, Institute of Child Health,
London), Dr G Morgan (consultant immunologist, Institute of Child Health, London),
Dr G Scadding (consultant rhinologist. Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital,
London), Dr D Winfield (consultant haematologist, Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield),
Sr V Brennan (representative, Royal College of Nursing, Immunology Nursing Group),
Dr S Carne (representative, Royal College of General Practitioners), Dr H Ewart
(consultant in public health medicine, Northampton, and representative, public
health and purchasing), Mr A Horn (representative, Department of Health), and
Mrs F Jarvis (representative, Primary Immunodeficiency Association). Members
of the medical advisory panel for the Primary Immunodeficiency Association are:
Dr D Brown (Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge), Dr M Haeney (Hope Hospital,
Manchester), Professor R Levinsky (Institute of Child Health, London), Professor
R Thompson (Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham), Dr D Webster (Royal
Free Hospital, London), and Dr T Wallington (Southmead Hospital, Bristol).
Appendix
Immunology centres
for specialist diagnosis and management of primary antibody deficiencies (*home
treatment centre)
EastAnglia
Cambridge-Addenbrooke's Hospital (Drs D Brown and P Ewan)
London
Specialist Children's Centre-Great Ormond Street Hospital* (Drs G Morgan and
S Strobel)
South West Thames-St George's Hospital* (Drs S Pereira (adults) and G Davies
(children))
North East Thames-Royal Free Hospital* (Dr D Webster)
Oxford
Oxford-John Radcliffe Hospital* (Drs H Chapel and G Bird)
Northern and Mersey
Newcastle—Newcastle General Hospital* (Drs A Fay and G Spickett (adults)
and A Cant (children))
North West
Salford-Hope Hospital* (Dr M Haeney)
Manchester-Manchester Royal Infirmary (Dr R Pumphrey)
South West
Bristol-Southmead Hospital (Dr T Wallington)
Trent
Nottingham-Queen's Medical Centre* (Professor H Sewell)
Leicester-Leicester Royal Infirmary (Professor K Whaley)
Wessex
Nearest centres: Bristol and Oxford
West Midlands
East Birmingham Hospital—Birmingham Heartlands Hospital* (Professor R
Thompson)Dudley Road Hospital—Dudley Road Hospital (Dr D Kumarartne)
Yorkshire
Leeds—St James Hospital (DrGooi)
Wales
Nearest centres: Birmingham, Bristol, Salford, and Oxford
Scottish Health Boards
Edinburgh—Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (Dr P L Yap)
Glasgow—Glasgow Royal Infirmary (Dr A Farrell)
Northern Ireland
Belfast—Royal Victoria Hospital* (Dr D McCluskey)
Republic of Ireland
Dublin—Sc James's Hospital '(Professor C Feighery)
1 - Asherson GL, Webster ADB. Diagnosis and treatment of immunodeficiency diseases.
Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1980.
2 - Hanson LA, Soderstrom R, Friman V, Hahn-Zoric M, Czerkinsky C, Quiding M,
et al. Update on IgA and IgG subclass deficiency. In: Chapel HM, Levmsky RJ,
Webster AD, eds. Progress in immune deficiency III. London: Royal Society of
Medicine, 1990:1-6.
3 - Jerreris R, Kumararatne DS. Selective IgG subclass deficiency: quantification
and clinical relevance (review). Clin Exp Immunol 1990;81:357-67.
4 - Hanson LA, Soderstrom R, Nilessen DE, Teman K, Bjorkander J, Soderstrom
T, et al. IgG subclass deficiency with or without IgA deficiency. Clin Immunol
Immunopathol 1991;61 (suppl):S70-7.
5 - Cunningham-Rundles C. Clinical and immunologic analysis of 103 patients
with common vanable immunodeficiency. J Clin lmmunol 1989;9:22-33.
6 - Hermaszewskki RA, Webster ABD. Primary hypogammaglobulinaemia: a survey
of clinical manifestations and complications. QJMed 1993;86:31-42.
7 - National Institute of Child Health, Intravenous Immunoglobulin Study Group.
Intravenous immune globulin for the prevention of bacterial infections in children
with symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus infection. .N Eng J Med 1991 ;325:73-80.
8 - Bjorkander J, Blake B, Hanson LA. Primary hypogammaglobulinaemia: impaired
lung function and body growth with delayed diagnosis and inadequate treatment.
Eur J Respir Dis 1984;65:529-36.
9 - Spickett GP, Misbah SA, Chapel HM. Primary antibody deficiency in adults
Lancet 1991;337:28l-4.
10 - Gooi HC. Primary immunodeficiency register. In: Chapel HM, Levinsky RI,
Webster AD, eds. Progress in immune deficiency III. London: Royal Society of
Medicine, 1990:103-5.
11 - Blore J, Haeney M. Primary antibody deficiency and diagnostic delay BMJ
1989;298:516-7.
12 - Chapel HM, Brennan VM, Delson E. Immunoglobulin replacement therapy by
self-infusion at home. Clin Exp Immunol 1988;73:160-2.
13 - Roifman CM, Levison H, Gelfand EW. High-dose versus low-dose intravenous
immunoglobulin in hypogammaglobulinaemia and chronic lung disease. Lancet 1987;i:1075-7.
14 - WHO Scientific Group. Primary immunodeficiency diseases. Immmodeficiency
Reviews 1992;3:195-236.
15 - Misbah S, Chapel H. Adverse effects of immunoglobulin therapy. Drug Safety
1993;9:254-62.
16 - Bjorkander J, Hammarstrom L, Smith CIE, Buckley RH, Cunningham-Rundles
C, Hanson LA. Immunoglobulin prophylaxis in patients with antibody deficiency
syndromes and anti-IgA antibodies. J Clin Immunol 1987;7:8-15.
17 - Burks AW, Sampson HA, Buckley RH. Anaphylactic reactions following gammaglobulin
administration in patients with hypogammaglobulinaemia: detection of IgE antibodies
to IgA. N Engl J Med 1986;314:560-4.
18 - Gardulf A, Hammarstrom L, Smith CIE. Home treatment of hypogammaglobulinaemia
with subcutaneous gammaglobulin by rapid infusion. Lancet 1991;338:162-6.
19 - Mitra G, Wong MF, Mozen MM, McDougal JS, Levy JA. Elimination of infectious
retroviruses during preparation of immunoglobins. Transfusion 1986;26:394-7.
20 - Bjorkander J, Cunningham-Rundles C, Lundin P, Olsson R, Soderstrom R. Intravenous
immunoglobulin prophylaxis causing liver damage in 16 of 77 patients with hypogammaglobulinaemia
or IgG subclass deficiency. Am J Med 1988;84:107-11.
21 - Vetrie D. The gene for X-linked immunodeficiency. Nature 1993;361:226-33.
22 - Hill A, Chapel H. X-linked immunodeficiency: the fruits of cooperation.
Nature 1993;361:494.